skip to Main Content

What are the differences between medico legal officer and ordinary physician

The purpose of a medico-legal dispute is to be able to convince the judge that you have a better argument than the opposition, in short, to win the argument based on more credible evidence. The reason there has been a legal debate is that the issues are controversial (gray instead of black or white). Throughout their medical studies, future doctors spend most of their time learning and studying the inner workings of the human body in order to pass their examinations, so that one day they may be able to accomplish that always daunting task already pursued by their predecessors to serve humanity, to restore normal health, To eradicate diseases, to prevent their occurrence, explain diseases to patients and stay out of prison. However, once in practice, the physician may one day be called upon to assess the medico-legal aspects of a case in his or her practice or that of a colleague, which may never have been demonstrated during medical school. It goes without saying that the expert has respect for the applicant. Whatever the circumstances of the claim, the expert listens to the story and tries to learn as many details as possible, something like a detective who reveals the truth methodically. It records and lists all the documents it has received from either the agent or the client. He must try to keep the story online and review events chronologically. He uses simple and clear language and strives not to be misunderstood. Its impartiality and transparency must be demonstrated at all times. The past and present are important, especially if the applicant has previously sustained an injury in the same location.

Habits such as smoking and medications should be recorded, as well as past and present operations and hospitalizations. While the doctor`s main job is to clearly explain the medical side of things, the lawyer`s job is to argue for his client and win the argument in points. The lawyer relies on the doctor to provide him with the necessary medical information, which he integrates into a legal thesis that he hopes will convince the arbitral tribunal of the accuracy of his testimony on behalf of his client. The idea is that neither the doctor nor the lawyer should see themselves as individuals, but as members of a team of investigators and interpreters who work together to shed light on the true nature of the dispute, to allow the judge to be well informed, to weigh the arguments, to see the truth and to find his side. Hard and honest work and common sense usually provide the tools to build a successful case. Teamwork is essential, neither the doctor nor the lawyer tries to surpass themselves. Winning for the customer is key. The predetermined rules of the legal system, which have already been established and improved over the years, if properly nourished and well-oiled, will provide the energy needed to complete the case and allow for an orderly and convincing presentation of the facts.

Regardless of the quality of the arguments, the final decision always rests with the judge or jury. If a party feels justice has been denied, there is always the appeal process to rely on. To explain the possible cause-and-effect relationships, the expert is guided by the type and intensity of the trauma, the time elapsed between the event and the complaint, the associated events before and after, the consistency of the impact – anatomical location – and the nature of the injury sustained, the quantity and quality of symtomatology, the premorbid state of the applicant, the natural history of the disease, and any other related diagnosis and treatment. It includes specialist medical advice obtained by the attending physician during medical treatment. It reports the results of laboratory tests and X-rays. He concludes things with a summary and conclusions, and then answers the client`s questions. He does not venture into areas that are not in demand, although he should write them down mentally and be prepared, if the opposition wants to answer them, to answer those questions with convincing arguments. With respect to aspiring physicians who are still in medical school, some of the aspects of this type of medicine included in their curriculum would, in my view, teach the scope and application of medical science in the lives of a large group of workers as a whole beyond the more sheltered confines of the hospital. The library, the operating room and the office. Forensics, which includes forensics, is a narrower front line that includes collecting, documenting, analyzing and presenting objective information (medical evidence) for use in the legal system. [3] Forensic pathology is a branch of medicine that deals with the application of medical knowledge for the purposes of law and the administration of justice. Specifically, it is the application of medical and paramedical sciences to clarify legal issues.

Meanwhile, medical jurisprudence refers to the knowledge of laws in accordance with medical practice. It also includes the duties, duties and rights of a physician with respect to matters between patient and physician.

Back To Top