skip to Main Content

Supreme court case results

Several Southern government officials, including the governor and legislature of Alabama, refused to comply with the Board of Education`s Brown v. decision. They argued that states could overturn federal court decisions if they found federal courts violated the Constitution. The court unanimously rejected this argument, ruling that only federal courts can decide when the Constitution is violated. AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A federal appeals court ruled Friday in favor of a Texas law targeting major social media companies like Facebook and Twitter, a victory for Republicans who accuse platforms of censoring conservative speech. Greer v. United States, United States v. Gary, (8-1 Opinion of Justice Kavanaugh, as well as Roberts C.J. and Justices Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch and Barrett, June 14, 2021. Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion that disagreed and dissented in part.) Summary: The Court upheld the Eleventh District Court of Appeals in Greer and quashed the Fourth District Court of Appeals in Gary. The court held that in cases of possession of an offender, a Rehaif error under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), in which the government must prove in a criminal possession case not only that the defendant knew he possessed a firearm, but also that he knew he was a criminal when he possessed the firearm, is not a basis for simple error-free.

unless the respondent first presents a sufficient argument or presentation on the appeal he or she would have made. Proof in court that he did not know he was a criminal. The decision can be found here. Summary: The court overturned the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The Court held that if a state court has ruled on the merits of a prisoner`s claim, a federal court cannot grant habeas without applying both the test prescribed by the Court in Brecht v. Abrahamson and Congress required by the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Enforcement of the Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA); The Sixth Judicial District erred in granting Mr. Davenport habeas relief solely on the basis of his assessment that he could meet the Brecht standard. LELAND, N.C. A North Carolina charter school is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review a Court of Appeals ruling that the school violated students` constitutional rights by requiring them to wear skirts.

summaries of all opinions (including agreements and disagreements), in cases and orders pleaded and not argued; Certiorari Fellowships for the upcoming term; a table indicating “Who wrote what” and a brief overview of the term in relation to all previous criminal and related cases in the United States. Supreme Court (with clickable links to cases). Participate in interactive and impactful Supreme Court cases that have shaped history and impacted law-abiding citizens today. A teacher accused T.L.O. of smoking in the bathroom. When she denied the allegation, the manager searched her purse and found cigarettes and marijuana accessories. A family court declared T.L.O. an offender.

The Supreme Court ruled that their rights were not violated because the students lowered their expectations of privacy at school. Summary: The court upheld the Sixth Circuit`s decision. The court ruled that pretrial detention, which is then counted as a period of reconviction, means a period of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(e), even though the court must calculate the balance sheet after learning whether time will be limited. Summary: The court overturned and dismissed the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The court ruled that a defendant who pleads guilty in a negotiated plea may benefit from subsequent changes to sentencing policies if the district court relies on the test to impose the sentence or accept the agreement. A defendant may seek relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) if it has entered into an agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C) (Type C Agreement) that allows the defendant and the government to “agree that a particular sentence or range of sentences is the appropriate solution to the case” and “binds the court [to the agreed judgment], as soon as it accepts the agreement”. Summary: The court cleared the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and remanded it in custody. The court found that the applicant`s argument before the District Court in favour of a specific sentence confirmed his contention on appeal that the sentence imposed was excessively long and that no formal or additional request was necessary to maintain a challenge to the length of the sentence in the case.

In times of war, courts are sometimes asked to strike a balance between individual rights and public safety. What lessons can be drawn from the tensions arising from this case? For more information, see Korematsu v. United States Photos courtesy of the U.S. Supreme Court Collection United States v. Briggs (8-0 Opinion of Alito J.A., joined by Roberts C.J. and Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh JJ. on December 10, 2020. Justice Barrett was not involved in the review or disposition of the cases. Justice Gorsuch filed a concurring opinion) The Supreme Court begins its new term Monday, hearing arguments for the first time after a summer recess and with new Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The court has already announced that it will decide cases on a number of important issues, including affirmative action, voting rights and LGBTQ rights. Summary: The court overturned the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The court held that under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254(e)(2), a federal court may not collect evidence or otherwise consider evidence other than state court records on the basis of the ineffective assistance of a state attorney after conviction. In the workplace case, the court dealt a blow to a key element of the Biden administration`s COVID-19 plan. In addition, the court authorized the administration to impose mandatory vaccination nationwide for workers in publicly funded health care facilities. The Supreme Court said it would continue to livestream arguments in the cases, even as it welcomes the public into its courtroom for a new term that begins Monday.`affaire Chavez-Meza v. United States (5-3 Opinion of Justice Breyer, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Ginsburg and Alito on 18 June 2018. Judge Kennedy, joined by Justices Kagan and Sotomayor, filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Gorsuch was not involved in the review or disposition of the case.) Summary: The court ruled the case controversial in light of the recently passed CLOUD Act. He explained the decision of the 2. District invalidated and sent the case back to the Court of Appeals with orders to overturn the district court`s decisions against Microsoft and order the district court to dismiss the case. Summary: The court overturned the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and dismissed it, ordering it to dismiss Zuhaydah`s current investigative motion. The court ruled that the District Court had wrongly rejected Zubaydah`s request for disclosure on the basis of state secrecy, in particular with regard to the existence (or non-existence) of a CIA facility in Poland.

Summary: The court upheld the decision of the Tenth Judicial District. The court found that wiretap warrants approved by a federal district judge in Kansas as part of the investigation into an alleged drug distribution ring in Kansas were not sufficient because they did not contain the information required by the wiretapping law and because the impugned wording, which allowed interception outside the territorial jurisdiction of the court, was superfluous. Summary: The court upheld the Arizona Supreme Court. The court ruled that a state appeals court, rather than a jury, had aggravating and mitigating circumstances in Clemens v. Mississippi on habeas corpus review in death penalty cases. Three huge Supreme Court cases that could change America The New York Times, October 3, 2022 Justices will soon hear important cases on suffrage, affirmative action and partisan gerrymandering. Here is an overview. A federal judge has refused to dismiss a lawsuit against Democratic Gov. John Carney over Delaware`s call for political balance in its courts. The decision is available here: honor important figures who, in related cases Brown v. Board of Education and Mendez v.

Westminster, made a theatrical presentation for readers. Learn more about this case. Teach students the meaning of Tinker v. Des Moines, which examines student rights in the First Amendment. Madison v. Alabama, (5-3 Opinions of Justice Kagan, as well as Roberts C.J. and Justices Ginsburg, Breyer and Sotomayor, February 27, 2019. Judge Alito, joined by Justices Thomas and Gorsuch, filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Kavanaugh was not present at the review or decision in the case.) Dahda vs. USA (8-0 Opinion of Mr Breyer of 14 May 2018.

Justice Gorsuch did not participate in the case.) We blogged live when the court released the opinion in Babcock v. Kijakazi. The decision is available at On Tuesday, the court heard challenges to the government`s lengthy detention of non-citizens claiming they were entitled to hearings. The United States on Wednesday called on the International Court of Justice to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Iran to recover frozen Iranian assets worth about $2 billion that the United States is recovering.

Back To Top